Christ chooses some as kings and priests unto God—Christ shall come again—John sees the Risen Lord.
[ Now why would John write things so cryptically as they are hard to understand? May I suggest a few reasons 1) something that is written cryptically stand a greater chance of being translated word for word as the translator does not comprehend the subject and therefore will try to stay truer to the original text keeping the plain and precious truth. 2) What he is describing is so out there that people would think he was nuts without the spirit to help them understand. 3) These are like parables, such that those whom they are intended for will understand them if they will put forth the effort. John’s masterwork, however, tells the rest of the story. It reassured the Saints of his day that, no matter how bad conditions looked, Jesus was still in charge, history was playing out according to God’s will, and the Christians would, in the end, triumph. something to remember Jesus made a comment in Matt. 24. Where he gives
numerous signs of the times and says, “Take heed that no man deceive
you. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall
deceive many.... For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets,
and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if [it were]
possible, they shall deceive the very elect” (Matt. 24:4-24).
Another way to look at what Jesus was saying is that he gives the signs
to tell the people when the Second advent is not occurring, not to
reveal to them when it will occur - not to be used to predict the future
and put a timeline to it as we often try to do. As he states plainly, “that
day and hour knoweth no [man], no, not the angels of heaven, but my
Father only” (Matt. 24:36).
so what then is the real purpose? to protect the believers from those who would deceive them, not to establish a clear chronology which can
only discerned by an elect few. When commentators on Revelation attempt
to establish a clear chronology leading up to the end, they are misusing
the signs of the last days. John's Revelation is considered one of the more, if not the most, difficult books of the NT. However, Joseph Smith said of it, "The
book of Revelation is one of the plainest books God ever caused
to be written" {TPJS, p. 290].
John uses two methods of obscuring his message. First, he
chronologically mixes up the text, so that one must very
carefully determine when the events he describes have or will
occur. Clues are provided, but oftentimes difficult to discern.
Second, he uses symbols derived from OT prophets. The
reader of this text must already know what these symbols mean
from the preceding OT prophets, otherwise their meaning cannot be
discerned. Thus, John's Revelation requires the reader, or
commentator, to be intimately familiar with the rhetoric and
style of the OT Prophets, which is no small things.
If one is familiar with the OT Prophets, and they can
unravel the chronological spaghetti, then John's Revelation
becomes quite transparent.
Comments, by Clark Goble
________________________________________________________________________
REVELATION INTRODUCTION
=======================
Authorship
----------
Arguments about Johnine authorship
1. John is affirmed as the author of Revelation by Justin Martyr,
Clement of Alexandria, Hippolytus, Origin, Cyprian and Irenaeus.
However all of these people lived after the writing of the text
and thus can only report the traditions handed to them or their own
suppositions. Several others denied this authorship, including
Denis of Alexandria, Eusebius, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory
Nazianzen, and John Chrsostum.
2. Historically the text refers to events from John's life. John
is identified as being exiled in Patmos and the text talks about
the writer being in exile on Patmos (1:9). Revelation 2-3 indicates
that the author was in a leadership over the seven churches and
there are strong traditions placing John in this position.
Unfortunately both traditions may have come from the text and not
from other sources.
3. The style of the text does not compare at all to John's other
writings, however the text, if it is Johanine, was one of John's
earliest works and may have been written while John was still
learning Greek. Also most of the book consistes of hundreds of
quotes from the Old Testament. Thus it is not surprising that it
reads like Hebrew clumsily transferred into poor Greek. It is
also possible that John had help in his works, perhaps from a
secretary, and this accounts for some of the language distinctiosn.
Finally the type of text is highly apocalyptic and simply is
different from John's other works. It also was written while John
was in exile, which may have contributed to the style.
4. The author calls himself John, and if the text is inspired, then
it is highly likely that the author really was John, or at least
a secretary writing for John. (1:4; 9; 22:8) The author also
speaks with a type of authority that would only have made sense
for a leader in the early church. some would argue that if it
is a forgery that this would still be true.
5. There are many parallels of imagery between the other Johanine
writings and the book of Revelation. For instance both use the
concept and term "logo" (Jn 1:1; Rev 19:13). Both use the
imagery of the lamb, the waters of life, "he that overcomes,"
a strong emphasis on keeping the commandments, and frequent use
of the adjective "true." Both texts talk about invitations to
those who are thirsty (Jn 7:37, Rev 22:17) and draw a sharp
contrast between good and evil.
6. The strongest piece of evidence for a Johnine authorship is the
testimony of the Book of Mormon. (1 Ne 14:19-27, Ether 4:16)
Date
----
The date of Revelation is fairly controversial and all of the arguments
for a specific date make numerous assumptions and are basically little
more than speculation. If John was the author then his rudementary
Greek seems to indicate that it was written before his other writings.
Most people date the text from the end of the reign of Domitian (81AD-
96AD). The reason for this is that the seven churches in Asia already
have a fair bit of history at the time of the writing (2:4; 3:1).
Domitian persecuted the Christian very heavily at this time, far more
so that Nero who some associate with some of the images in the text.
The worship of the "beast" parallels Emperor worship which became an
official policy during the reign of Domitian. However Emperor worship
had transpired earlier to this and had even caused riots among the Jews
in Alexandria during the time of Claudius. Irenaeus puts the date of
Revelation during the time of Domitian.
Background
----------
The Revelation was written at Patmos, a penal colony off the coast of
Asia Minor near Ephesus. John had been exiled there because of his
Christian beliefs. Presumably he was placed there because he was a
leader of the Christians, with Peter already crucified. The text may
have originally been several separate revelations that were later
connected into one whole. It is also possible that many parts of the
text have been lost. Certainly Joseph Smith switch a few large
sections around. Ether 4:16-17 can be read to indicate that the
fulness of John's record will be revealed just prior to the events
being fulfilled. These verses are somewhat ambiguous on this point
though.
The text belongs to a genre of literature called Apocalyptic literature.
Examples of this are found in Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Daniel. John
quotes all of these authors quite extensively and uses imagery from a
wide variety of places. Other apocalyptic texts are found outside of
the canon like 1 Enoch or the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs. John
quotes from these texts as well. In fact John quotes the OT extensively
throughout the text, frequently using the language and imagery of the
OT to express new ideas.
Structure
---------
The text is broken into roughly seven sections
Prologue (1:1 - 1:8)
Letters to the Seven Churches / Heavenly Ascent (1:9 - 3:22)
Entry into Heaven (4:1 - 5:14)
Kingdom / Seven Seals, Trumpets and Plagues (6:1 - 16:21)
Punishment of Babylon and Pagan Nations (17:1 - 20:15)
New Creation (21:1 - 22:5)
Epilogue (22:6 - 22:21)
Structurally we also have a breakdown following the pattern of
Persecution, Judgment and Triumph. This pattern is repeated in several
places in the text.
Important Symbol
----------------
Seven:
The number seven is very important in the text. We have seven
main divisions to the text but also the following:
Seven years for the tribulations to last - 42 months for the beast
to rule (13:4-5; 19:20) and 1260 days for the 2 witnesses to
hold Jerusalem (11:3)
Seven Churches (2-3)
Seven Spirits/Leaders (1:4;3:1;4:5;5:6)
Seven attributes of God paralleling the seven attributes of Isaiah
11:2 and the seven eyes of the Lord in Zech 4:10
Seven candlesticks (1:12,13,20; 2:1) (see Zech 4 as well)
Seven stars (1:16,20;2:1;3:1)
Seven lamps (4:5)
Seven seals (5:1;5:5)
Seven horns (5:6)
Seven eyes (5:6)
Seven angels (8:2,6; 15:1,6-8;16:1;17:1;21:9)
Seven trumpets (8:2,6)
Seven thunders (10:3-4)
Seven thousand (11:13)
Seven visions (12:1 - 15:4)
Seven heads (12:3;13:1;17:3,7,9)
Seven crowns (12:3)
Seven plagues (15:1,6,8;21:9)
Seven vials (15:7;17:1;21:9)
Seven mountains (17:9)
Seven kings (17:10-11)
Seven divisions to each letter
Seven "I ams" (1:8,11,17,18;21:6;22:13,16)
Seven doxologies in heaven (4:9-11;5:8-13;7:9-12;11:16-18;14:2-3;
15:2-4; 19:1-6)
Seven beatitudes (blessed is...) (1:3;14:13;16:15;19:9;20:6;22:7;
22:14)
I'm not sure what the significance of seven is, but John certainly seems
taken with it. He may be utilizing the image of the seven days of
creation. I've already mentioned his use of the seven attributes of
diety. According to Joseph Smith there were seven thousand years of the
earth's temporal existence as well (D&C 77). Finally in many heavenly
ascents, seven was the number of heavens. In Hebrew symbolism seven as
a symbol of completeness and wholeness.
Why Did John Write Revelations?
He was living when many of the Saints were discouraged, even frightened. They were in the midst of the greatest crisis yet faced by the early Church. The ordeal through which they were passing had terrifying prospects. Rome, the seemingly omnipotent master of their world, had determined that holding to the Christian faith constituted a crime worthy of death. At the time John wrote Revelation, a power struggle raged within the Christian community. John wrote his work for those who yet clung to the truth. He warned against false prophets and their source of inspiration and emphasized that God would not allow them to continue without consequence. Thus the focus of Revelation—the core around which everything revolves—is the issue of authority. Who really controls the world? Is it the political institutions, the powers of evil, or God? To the faithful few, struggling against external pressure and growing persecutions and being buffeted by the alternate voices of the apostates, the message of Revelation, with its omnipotent and avenging, yet caring, God, must have brought comfort and hope with its promise of final victory.
“Are we expected to understand the book of Revelation?” Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated:
Certainly. Why else did the Lord reveal it? The common notion that it deals with beasts and plagues and mysterious symbolisms that cannot be understood is just not true. It is so far overstated that it gives an entirely erroneous feeling about this portion of revealed truth. Most of the book—and it is no problem to count the verses so included—is clear and plain and should be understood by the Lord’s people. Certain parts are not clear and are not understood by us—which, however, does not mean that we could not understand them if we would grow in faith as we should.
The Lord expects us to seek wisdom, to ponder his revealed truths, and to gain a knowledge of them by the power of his Spirit.
Modern day revelation teaches us that Joseph Smith knew John personally.Joseph inquired about John in 1829 using the Urim and Thummim, and was taught that John was still alive and was leading the main body of the Lost Ten Tribes (HC 1:176).
]
8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, [ John’s intent is to show the Lord is still alive and still active in his work, so John provides a new quote form the Savior to prove it, one which has just come directly from the Lord himself. Use of the statement “Alpha and Omega” means he is the beginning and the end. Alpha is the first letter of the Greek alphabet and omega is the last. So the idea or "merism" is that there is nothing before the first and nothing after that last so they are all inclusive. A “merism”is a statement of complete inclusivity, such as “heavens and earth”. There isn't anything that isn't either heavens or earth in the Creation, so the statement “heavens and earth” is all inclusive. The Lord exists independent of what we think or how we feel about him, and he has always existed and will continue to exist in this manner. Being killed in the flesh does not extinguish the Lord’s spirit or diminish His capacity. ] saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. [ This is the new statement that John is making sure that we know that he received from the Lord himself. The statement suggests that the Lord does exist and will continue to exist independant of what we think or feel about it. He has always existed and will continue to exist, just because he has been killed in the flesh does not extinguish the Lord’s spirit or diminish His capacity. ]